Reporting period:
This page provides statistics on Single Market infringement proceedings open on 1 December 2024. All comparisons are with the figures for the last reporting date, 1 December 2023. The statistics do not include late transposition cases (known as “non-communication cases”), except in the “Types of cases” pie chart. This is to avoid counting such cases twice since the Transposition enforcement tool already covers them.
Infringements and the Single Market – why does it matter?
To make the Single Market work for all, common EU rules are in place, facilitating the free movement of people, goods, services and capital. These rules can only deliver their intended results if they are properly implemented and enforced throughout the EU.
It is a joint responsibility of the Member States and the Commission to ensure compliance with the Single Market rules and proper enforcement of people’s rights granted by such rules. Member States must comply with EU rules they have agreed to as co-legislators. They must detect and remedy Single Market rules’ breaches happening within their respective jurisdictions. As mandated by Article 17(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the Commission should ensure that all Member States implement and comply with Single Market rules.
The Commission can take legal action, by initiating an infringement procedure in line with Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), against any EU Member State that fails to implement EU law. The Commission may refer the issue to the Court of Justice of the European Union, which can impose financial penalties in certain cases. More about infringement procedures.
Monitoring infringements helps to make the Single Market work better. It highlights the efforts that Member States are making to ensure that Single Market law is implemented properly and encourages them to improve their performance.
Recent developments
The European Council of 30 June 2023 called for an independent high-level report on the future of the Single Market. Member States and the Commission entrusted the former Italian head of government, Enrico Letta, to draft the report, seeking for concrete and ambitious recommendations. His Much More Than A Market high-level report (the Letta Report) was published on 17 April 2024. It puts forward a range of recommendations on enforcement and implementation to secure the resilience and competitiveness of the Single Market, by strengthening the enforcement of its rules. The report is dedicated to the memory of Jacques Delors, who made the Single Market the cornerstone of European integration.
Coupled with Enrico Letta’s analysis of the future of the Single Market, on 9 September 2024, former European Central Bank President and former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi published his report on the future of European competitiveness (the Draghi Report). This report shows that the Single Market remains highly fragmented and stresses that fully implementing the rules is crucial for a successful industrial policy, competitive European companies and stronger economic growth.
On 17 September 2024, Ursula von der Leyen, President of the Commission, issued the mission letters for the new College members. Among other critical tasks, the Executive Vice-President for Prosperity and Industrial Strategy will have to develop a horizontal Single Market strategy for a modernised and deeper Single Market that promotes the cross-border provision of services and cross-border movement of goods, including essential goods. He will also ensure the existing rules are fully implemented and speed up the removal of barriers.
Key messages
- 7 Member States improved on their December 2023 overall performance (Ireland, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Lithuania, Slovenia and Slovakia), but the situation deteriorated for 7 other Member States (Belgium, Germany, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland and Portugal). 4 Member States (Croatia, Cyprus, Lithuania and Slovenia) performed better than the EU average (up from 1 the last year).
- The number of Single Market infringement cases fell further (by -6% in the last year), leading to a cumulative decrease of 21% in the last 4 years. This trend may be related to the use of the EU Pilot dialogue between the Commission and Member States over time.
- Spain is still the Member State with the highest number of pending Single Market infringement cases (42). It is closely followed by Greece and Hungary (41), Italy (39) and Belgium (34), which replaces Germany in the top 5. On the other hand, Latvia and Finland are the only Member States that have 10 cases or less.
- The environment (35%), transport (17%), and energy (12%) are the 3 sectors with the highest number of Single Market infringement cases.
- For the first time since the COVID-19 outbreak, the average case duration decreased. It is now 45.8 months, down 7% from 49 months a year ago, but up 31% compared to December 2019. 25% more new cases were launched than last year (173, up from 138), but several very old cases weigh heavily on the average duration.
- The average time to comply with Court rulings in the SIngle Market area is still very far from the 18-month indicative target and keeps increasing (rising from 54.3 months a year ago to 61.3 months in December 2024, doubling the average of 5 years ago). Slovakia and Poland are the only Member States that meet this target.
Overall performance
Map legend
A Member State’s performance across all indicators relating to infringements is calculated by scoring each of the 4 indicators in the Performance indicators table below as follows:
RED = -1, YELLOW = 0 and GREEN = +1.
The colours on the map represent the sum of these scores:
- green: 2 or higher = above average
- yellow: -1, 0 or 1 = average
- red: -2 or lower = below average
- 7 Member States improved on their December 2023 overall performance, but the situation has deteriorated for 7 others. Overall, the situation has slightly worsened compared with last year. 18 Member States now have an average or above-average performance, down from 21.
- 9 Member States have consistently performed at or above the average level over the past 9 years and deserve full recognition (Denmark, Estonia, Croatia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Slovenia and Finland).
- For the 9th consecutive year (since December 2017), Spain performs below average.
Performance indicators
Indictor values | green | yellow | red |
---|---|---|---|
[1] Number of pending Single Market infringement proceedings & [3] Duration of Single Market infringement proceedings (in months) | < average -10% | average ±10% | > average +10% |
[2] Change over the last 12 months (change in the number of Single Market infringement cases) | decrease | no change | increase |
[4] Time taken to comply with a Court ruling in the Single Market area (in months) | ≤ 8 months | > 8 ≤18 months | > 18 months |
This table combines the most relevant indicators to provide a better overview of Member States’ compliance with the requirement to implement and apply Single Market rules. The table shows that 4 Member States (Croatia, Cyprus, Lithuania and Slovenia) perform better than the EU average when all indicators are considered. Last year, only Malta was in such a good situation.
Indicator [1]: Number of pending Single Market infringement proceedings
This indicator shows the number of open Single Market-related infringement cases for every Member State and the EU average. It may not provide the full picture of the degree of compliance with Single Market rules. This is because the number of infringement cases depends on several factors, including the size of the market in individual Member States.
Total number of cases: 658 (down from 699 in December 2023 – decrease of 6.2%)
Average number of cases per Member State: 24 (down from 26)
Detailed comments
- Belgium now replaced Germany in the top 5 of Member States with the highest number of pending Single Market cases. This top 5 accounts for 30% of all cases.
- At the other end of the ranking, Luxembourg and Estonia are no longer in the small group of Member States with 10 cases or less. Finland now joins Latvia in this group.
- This year, Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy and Finland match or reach the lowest number of Single Market infringement cases they have ever had. By contrast, Hungary equals the highest number it had in December 2023.
Indicator [2]: Change over the last 12 months (change in the number of Single Market infringement cases)
Member States where the number of cases rose: 7 (down from 8)
Member States where the number of cases fell: 15 (same)
Member States with no change: 5 (up from 4)
Detailed comments
- In December 2018, the total number of Single Market infringement cases was similar to the number of cases this year (660 without the UK and 658 respectively). Compared to that year, the Member States with the most dramatic reduction in the percentage of cases are Germany (-27%), Latvia (-23%) and Denmark (-22%). The Member States with the highest increase are Bulgaria (+48%) and Hungary (+41%).
- 5 Member States (Denmark, Ireland, Croatia, Italy and Cyprus) reversed last year’s negative trend by reducing their number of cases. By contrast, Belgium, Luxembourg, Malta, Austria and Portugal were unable to maintain their progress from last year, with 1 to 3 additional cases. When assesing these changes, the total number of cases for each Member State must be considered (Indicator [1]).
Indicator [3]: Duration of Single Market infringement proceedings
The December 2016 Communication on EU Law: Better Results through Better Application underlined the importance of limiting any distortion of Single Market rules as much as possible. This was also reflected in the March 2020 enforcement action plan that proposed setting ambitious additional benchmarks. An average maximum duration of 36 months (to either close a case or send it to the Court) seems a reasonable initial target.
Member States where the case duration increased: 7 (down from 17)
Member States where the case duration fell: 20 (up from 10)
Detailed comments
- The average case duration decreased for the first time in 5 years. It is now 45.8 months, down 7% from 49 months a year ago, but up 31% compared to December 2019. 6 Member States have now a case duration below the 36-month indicative target (up from 0 last year).
- Among the 20 Member States whose case duration fell in the past year (by 6.7 months on average), the reduction in duration of Luxembourgish, Maltese and Slovak cases is quite impressive (24, 22.9 and 12.6 months respectively).
- In 7 Member States, the average case duration is longer than a year ago, increasing by 3.6 months on average. This increase is higher in 2 of those Member States: Denmark (+9.4 months) and Germany (+7.6 months). Both recorded their highest average duration ever.
Indicator [4]: Time taken to comply with a Court ruling in the Single Market area
Article 260(1) TFEU, as interpreted by the Court, requires that after a Court ruling establishing a breach of EU legislation, the Member State concerned takes swift action to ensure compliance with EU law. An average maximum duration of 18 months for the Member States to comply with a Court judgment is considered as an indicative target.
Member States where compliance time increased: 12 (up from 9)
Member States where compliance time fell: 6 (same)
Detailed comments
- The average compliance time is still very far from the indicative target and continues to increase (from 54.3 months a year ago to 61.3 months this year, double the average 5 years ago). Slovakia and Poland are the only Member States that met the 18-month compliance target, while Italy no longer meets it.
- 6 Member States (Denmark, Ireland, France, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden) managed to cut their average compliance time. By contrast, 12 Member States had longer average compliance times than a year ago. Netherlands experienced the most dramatic increase (+67.6 months).
EEA EFTA countries
Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway are also subject to Single Market rules under the EEA Agreement. They are monitored by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.
However, there is a time lag between the adoption or repeal of a legal act in the EU and its addition to or removal from the EEA Agreement. The body of EU law applicable in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway may therefore differ from that in the EU. This should be borne in mind when comparing the Single Market Scoreboard and the EEA Scoreboard.
Total Single Market infringement cases open on 1 December 2024: 163 (up from 95 in December 2023), of which:
- incorrect transposition/application: 42, down from 46 (see figure below) = 26% of all open infringement cases (Iceland 23, Norway 16 and Liechtenstein 3)
- late transposition (directives): 22, up from 15 (Iceland 14, Norway 4 and Liechtenstein 4) = 13%
- late implementation* (regulations): 99, up from 34 (Iceland 88 and Norway 11) = 61%
The problematic sectors are still transport (16% of infringements) and persons – other (11%).
* Under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement, regulations incorporated into the Agreement “shall as such be made part of the internal legal order” of the EEA EFTA countries. In Liechtenstein, however, regulations are directly applicable and do not have to be implemented.
Trends in the EU
Changes in the number of Single Market infringement cases
- The current report shows a further decrease in the number of Single Market infringement cases (by -6% in the last year). The decrease in the last 4 years is 21%. The trends in number of infringement cases may be related to the use of the EU Pilot dialogue between the Commission and Member States over time.
- 214 of the 699 cases pending 12 months ago have now been resolved. Particular progress was made in the areas of transport (49 cases closed), services and professions (41 cases) and the environment (40 cases).
- 173 new Single Market infringement cases were launched in the last year (not including those for late transposition) and were still pending on 1 December 2024. Out of them, 61 concerned the environment (33%), 32 connectivity/media/digital society (17%) and 27 transport (15%).
- On the distribution by type of infringement, 40 of the new cases concerned the incorrect transposition of directives (22%), and 59 had to do with the incorrect application of directives (32%). The remaining 83 cases involved the incorrect application of regulations, decisions and the Treaties; these now account for 45% of all cases (up from 31% last year).
Facts and figures
Average duration by sector
The duration of air transport cases is inflated by factors beyond the control of either the national authorities or the Commission. This applies particularly to the bilateral agreements with Russia (25 cases) that still do not comply with EU legislation, and it was therefore decided not to include the sector in the figure above. The deterioration in EU-Russia relations following the illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine make it almost impossible for Member States to address and settle the outstanding legal issues at this point in time.
The comment under “Indicator [3] – Duration of infringement proceedings” above on the increase in case duration by Member State is also relevant to case duration by sector. When a substantial number of quite recent cases are resolved (or if few new cases are launched), the remaining older cases have a bigger impact on the calculation of the average duration.
Types of case
- 83% of cases concern Single Market directives (down from 85%), and 17% concern the wrong application of Single Market-related Treaty articles, regulations and decisions (up from 15%).
- The number of pending infringement cases for the late transposition of Single Market directives slightly decreased (502, down from 528). The number of directives to be transposed in the reporting period is stable: 21 compared to 22 last year.
The number of pending infringement cases for late transposition (502) of Single Market directives is much higher than the current number of missing transpositions and those transpositions declared partial by the Member States or by a formal Commission decision (223). This is because the Commission needs time to assess the completeness of the measures belatedly notified, and, if applicable, to close non-communication proceedings. For more on this, see “Indicator [1] - Transposition deficit” in the Transposition governance tool.
Single Market infringement cases by sector and Member State
This table shows the total number of Single Market infringement cases for each Member State on 1 December 2024, broken down by sector. Sectors with fewer of these cases are included in “Other sectors”. The highlighted figures show the sector(s) with the most cases in each Member State (where relevant, 10% or more of the total number of pending cases). (#) = Total number of infringement cases by sector
Member State | Air transport (54) | Atmospheric pollution (60) | Chemical substances, industrial and biotechnological hazards (13) | Connectivity/Media/Digital society (34) | Direct taxation (24) | Employment, social affairs and inclusion (27) | Energy (55) | Environmental impact (15) | Financial services (35) | Free movement of persons and Union citizenship (11) | Justice (incl. non discrimination and data protection) (11) | Nuclear safety and radioactive waste (22) | Public procurement (14) | Road and rail transport (21) | Services and Professions (47) | Transport safety (29) | Waste management (70) | Water protection and management (57) | Other sectors – less than 10 cases (59) | TOTAL (658) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 42 | ||||
Greece | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 41 | ||||||
Hungary | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 41 | ||
Italy | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 39 | |||
Belgium | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 34 | |||||
Germany | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 32 | ||
Bulgaria | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 31 | |||||
Poland | 2 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 31 | |||||
Slovakia | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 31 | ||||||
France | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 29 | ||||||
Romania | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 28 | |||||||||
Portugal | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 27 | |||||
Czechia | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 26 | ||||
Austria | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 26 | |||
Netherlands | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 25 | |||||
Ireland | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 20 | |||||||
Croatia | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | |||||||
Sweden | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | ||||||||
Slovenia | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 18 | ||||||||
Cyprus | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | ||||||||
Malta | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Denmark | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 | ||||||||
Estonia | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 12 | |||||||||
Lithuania | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | |||||||||
Luxembourg | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | |||||||||||
Latvia | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | ||||||||||
Finland | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
Sectors with the most Single Market infringement cases
- Environment – 35% of all cases (especially atmospheric pollution, water protection and management, and waste management)
- Transport – 17% (especially air transport, road and rail transport, and transport safety)
- Energy (including nuclear safety and radioactive waste) – 12%
Problematic sectors by Member State in the Single Market area
- Environment – Finland (63% of all cases), Estonia (50%), Ireland, Greece, France, Croatia, Italy, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia (more than 40%), Bulgaria, Denmark, Spain, Cyprus, Portugal, Romania and Slovenia (more than 35%)
- Transport – Denmark (36% of all cases), Germany and the Netherlands (28%), Luxembourg and Austria (27%)
- Energy – Croatia (26% of all cases) and Romania (29%)
- Financial services – Sweden (26% of all cases)
- Services and professions – Malta (27% of all cases)